Thursday, April 5, 2018

G. R. No. 207843

CIR vs Court of Tax Appeals and Petron Corp
G. R. No. 207843

Facts:

Petron is engaged in the manufacture and marketing of petroleum products, imports alkalyte as a raw material or blending component for the manufacture of ethanol-blended motor gasoline. The CIR has ruled that alkalyte is exempt from the payment of the excise tax because it was not among those articles enumerated as subject to excise tax under the Title VI of the Republic Act No. 8424 or the 1997 NIRC.

Issue:

Whether or not it is under the jurisdiction of the CIR to interpret tax laws.

Held:

Yes, it is under the jurisdiction of CIR to interpret tax laws. According to Section 4 of the Tax Code, on the Power of the Commissioner to Interpret Tax Laws and to Decide Tax Cases. The power to interpret the provisions of this Code and other tax laws shall be under the exclusive and original jurisdiction of the Commissioner, subject to review by the Secretary of Finance.

The power to decide disputed assessments, refunds or internal revenue taxes, fees and other charges, penalties imposed in relation thereto, or other matters arising under this Code or other laws or portions thereof administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue is vested in the commissioner, subject to the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Tax Appeals.


Applying the principle of ejusdem generis, the phrase 'other matters arising under this Code' should be interpreted as of the same nature as those that have preceded them. As such, the CIR was correct in its interpretation of Section 148 (e) of the NIRC to include alkalyte among the articles subject to customs duties, as it is provided in the first paragraph of Section 4 that the interpretation of the same is under the original jurisdiction of the CIR.

No comments:

Post a Comment

GR No 170257

Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue GR No 170257 FACTS:           On Aug 15, 1996, RCBC re...